Big difference between using server plugins and TinyPNG api
Permalink Browser Info Environment
At first I used the server plugins to optimize the images (I gained KB's of space)
I ran another test through the TinyPNG api (I gained MB's of space)
Would be nice if the server could do the same impressive space saving and compression.
I ran another test through the TinyPNG api (I gained MB's of space)
Would be nice if the server could do the same impressive space saving and compression.
| Type: | Pre-Sale |
|---|---|
| Status: | In Progress |
Good to know.
Anywhere I can fiddle with the code in the package which settings the server plugins have to use?
Or add it as an advanced config setting?
Anywhere I can fiddle with the code in the package which settings the server plugins have to use?
Or add it as an advanced config setting?
Yes, see for example image_optimizer/src/ImageOptimizer/Optimizer/Pngquant.php.
For command options, you'd need to look into the binaries / server libraries themselves.
For command options, you'd need to look into the binaries / server libraries themselves.
The TinyPNG service is awesome, and is free if you only do x-optimizations per month, which is configurable.